Next PageNext Page
End of preview. Back to top.
Administrative Science Quarterly © 2011 Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University
Administrative Science Quarterly © 2011 Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University
Abstract:
A nine-year ethnography is used to show how two investment
banks' controls, including socialization, targeted bankers' bodies, how
the bankers' relations to their bodies evolved, and what the
organizational consequences were. The banks' espoused and therefore
visible values emphasized autonomy and worklife balance; their less
visible embodied controls caused habitual overwork that bankers
experienced as self-chosen. This paradoxical control caused conflict
between bankers and their bodies, which bankers treated as unproblematic
objects. The conflict generated dialectic change that cognitive control
theories overlook because they neglect the body. Cognitive control
theories predict outcomes only in bankers' first three years, when the
banks benefited from bankers' hard work. Starting in year four, body
breakdowns thwarted organizational control. Despite bankers' increased
attempts to control their bodies, performance declined. Starting in year
six, intensified breakdowns forced some bankers to treat their bodies
as knowledgeable subjects. Because the body cannot be socialized
completely, it helped numerous bankers transcend the banks'
socialization and modify their behaviors. Surprisingly, the banks
benefited from this loss of control because the bankers' ethics,
judgment, and creativity increased.
No comments:
Post a Comment